Maori activist lawyer and numb-nuts Anna Sykes is misleading New Zealanders and Maoridom when she alleges that Karotangi Paki did not receive preferential treatment before corrupt and imbecilic District Court Judge Phillippa Cunningham. All of the co-accused received sentences of being discharged without conviction.
Sykes obtuse belief is that a criminal with form, [Paki] who has pleaded guilty to serious offending committed whilst before the Courts on other serious offending, should be let off conviction because otherwise he may not be rewarded with a bullshit “honorary” title of King Fucknuckle of Nevereverawanker, [pronounced Ngaruawahia]
Justice is about fairness, and the fair outcome would have been convictions entered on all charges, and a sentence of 300 hours community work, 12 months loss of licence, and a fine of $1’000.00 – oh and Court Costs of $270.00.
And the warning being given that the next time that Paki appears in front of the Courts he will likely face incarceration in a cosy cell inside his fathers pretend “Waikato Kingdom”.
Sykes has shown her true colours and competence [if New Zealand is ever unlucky enough to have her foisted apon the small Pacific nation as an elected politician] as she does not disclose whether the co-accused had any previous offending as did Paki with drink driving, and wrapping a vehicle around a power-pole after losing control. In fact, it is clear that Paki’s co-accused did not have any previous form.
Secondly Paki shows signs of recidivism, and actually his offending brings into play the three strike rule; that being that Paki committed serious driving offending when 16, then at 18 was caught with 7 times the legal limit for his age whilst driving, then just to top it all off, whilst before the Courts on the drink driving, racist Paki reoffended committing burglary and theft.
It is LF’s opinion that the other offenders should have received diversion as a minimum if it was their first offence. If the charges were their first offences the Court could have concluded that it was Paki that was the influence on them becoming involved in the offending in the first place. After all Paki is anti-authority, and clearly a racist , as demonstrated by the, to say the least, unwise comments posted on his facebook page.
Then there is the clear association of Paki with the Mongrel Mob; allegedly a criminal organization that has chapters mainly in the North Island of New Zealand. The gang manufactures and distributes illicit drugs from Marijuana to Methamphetamine [Street name “P”]. The gang is also allegedly racist, particularly towards anyone who happens to be of Asian ethnicity.
LF believes that the reason why Paki was not sentenced with the other two offenders is because he would not have been sentenced on the Drink Driving charges as at that time. Therefore if he had received the same treatment, even though he would not have deserved it because of his earlier offending when 16, there would have been no hope of receiving yet another “get off without conviction” on the drink driving charge having earlier been sentenced on the burglary and theft charges.
Finally – fact’s that no one else seems to have cottoned on to.
Paul Wicks imbecilic argument before the witless and likely corrupt Judge Phillippa Cunningham that somehow Paki getting his just deserts would awaken the “Maori nation” that possibly this criminal would not be a suitable replacement for the current King if convicted is obtuse for the following reasoning. Whether Paki was convicted or not, he admitted to the offending, and is the same criminal he was before the judges decision and after the judges decision.
Then there is of course the fact that there is no “Maori King”. It is a further fraud of a single Tribe and therefore has no currency before the Courts. What some tribe do in the fucking Waikato is their concern and only theirs.
The Crown is considering an appeal, and that appeal should proceed to test the complete picture with all of the facts around this case made public, inclusive of the statements from the other offenders as to whose idea the offending was, who drove the vehicle involved in the offending, and who was to benefit from the stolen property.
LF believes that Paki’s discharge without convictions would be overturned before a Full Court [5 member bench] of the Court of Appeal, if the Court applied the evidence to the offending, and the inviolable fact that we are all equal before the law.
As an aside another Maori made claim to royalty, and in LF’s opinion deserved his Royal Status. Of course we are referring to Prince Tui Teka, who previously belonged to a l;ittle known band called the Royal Maoris and Samoans.
Take a look at this nostalgic slaughtering of another Kings song by the Maori Prince Tui Teka – this time a real King was involved – Elvis Presley – but we suspect that Elvis would have been turning in his royal grave had he the misfortune of witnessing this home grown right royal balls-up that the Kiwis like to call entertainment; not at all that dissimilar to the even more amateurish balls-up they like to call justice.
No Comments
Christ we laughed and laughed – what must the rest of the world think of us.