In today’s Dominion Post Phil Kitchin has come out with a story pre-empting New Zealand’s 60 minutes story (Chanel 3) due to air tomorrow night (Sunday 9/9/2012). We here at Lauda Finem have also been collecting and collating evidence supplied by our own informants.
These informants are complaining of corrupt practice, malfeasance and medical specialist’s who ACC obviously has in their pocket. Most hail from ACC’s New Plymouth Office, which is headed up by a manager by the name of Janet Tinson.
We also have evidence of ACC staff under Tinson knowingly exagerating medical qualifications, intimidating claimants and deliberately misleading claimants as to their rights so as to disentitle the victims of their outrageous misconduct: conduct that by design attracts substantial personal gain, in the form of commissions, for the perpetrator and saves the Corporation millions every year. We will be posting that story next week following Sunday’s 60 Minutes expose:
ACC pays millions to send its ‘hatchets’
ACC is spending millions of dollars flying doctors around New Zealand to assess long-term clients who have already been assessed by other doctors.
The policy has been slammed by John Miller – one of the country’s top lawyers specialising in ACC legislation – who said the so-called “independence” of some assessors was a sham.
ACC lawyers, advocates and claimant groups know those doctors as “hatchet men and women”, Mr Miller said.
“They are not independent, as a substantial part of their income comes from ACC,” he said.
ACC figures reveal the corporation pays millions of dollars a year to a group of “independent assessors”, often flying them to towns or cities where other doctors with suitable qualifications already practise.
In some cases the ACC assessors are flown from the South Island to North Island cities.
At least $3 million was spent last year on airfares and assessment fees for a group of less than 12 doctors.
Mr Miller said medical professionals had expressed serious concerns to him about the issue.
Because some assessors earned virtually all their income from ACC it was “inevitable” they would tend to “provide reports ACC wants”.
“The old saying of ‘he who pays the piper calls the tune’ definitely applies with ACC assessors. The use of such assessors actually damages and diminishes ACC’s reputation,” Mr Miller said. “ACC knows the assessors who have particular fixed medical views, for example on degeneration . . . and they keep sending injured claimants to be assessed by those assessors as they know they will receive reports they want.”
Mr Miller said ACC advocates know when clients are sent for assessments by “the same usual suspects . . . there will be an adverse outcome for the injured claimant”.
ACC has seen a drop in the number of cases it is winning as claimants fight assessments.
The corporation won 77 per cent of cases challenged by clients in 2009 but in the year to date that figure has dropped to 56 per cent.
Mr Miller said his firm had experienced cases where independent assessors such as occupational therapists for seriously injured clients refused to provide reports “for us in ACC disputes”.
“They fear that it will affect their livelihood from ACC contracts,” he said.
“It confirms in people’s minds it is an organisation more concerned with removing claimants from ACC assistance this way rather than being concerned with properly rehabilitating injured claimants off the scheme.”
Mr Miller said the solution would be for ACC to start using a group of trusted assessors who could “be used by both sides.”
ACC’s claims management acting general manager Phil Riley said ACC chose appropriate providers, but if clients did not want to see them because of genuine concerns, a choice of two alternative providers was offered.
If clients chose not to see a local assessor, ACC could arrange for a specialist from another area to travel to their location.
“For practicality purposes, we try to send specialists to other areas when there are a number of clients to see in that area. This is why ACC flies specialist medical professionals to other regions, to hold ‘day clinics’ for ACC clients.”
ACC paid specialists at market rates, Mr Riley said.
ACC Minister Judith Collins said changes she made to ACC’s board include new priorities for the corporation to ensure entitlements were delivered transparently.
She said ACC must follow a fair process for assessments and provide best practice and lawful services to preserve public trust.
However ACC would not be a soft touch for people trying to take advantage of it, Ms Collins said.
Source: ACC pays millions to send its ‘hatchets’ Phil Kitchin, (Fairfax NZ News)
Bibliography:
Labour scathing of Rebstock’s ACC job (TV3)
Dr Peter jansen to Sue ACC Sexual Abuse Victim – ACCforum
Not a Good day for Peter Jansen (ACC) (K1K1 blog)
Dr Peter Jansen should research The Streisand Effect | Whale Oil
GPs divided on defamation action – New Zealand Doctor
Auckland GP at centre of defamation fiasco – New Zealand Doctor
Legal row over ACC blogger – politics – national | Stuff.co.nz
NOSTALGIA-NZ: Joe Karam, Peter Jansen
K1W1: Peter Jansen Shows his true colours
Thread ACC’s Dr. Peter Jansen suing for defamation
Some great advice re Brain Injured clients – ACCforum
Acc Bias / Non Biased Medical Professionals – ACCforum
help wanted in christchurch for Neuropsychological report – ACCforum
ACC Asessors/Contractors – ACCforum
Well Done Fairgo re 60minutes program – ACCforum (update, 10/09/2012)
Wouldn’t It Be Nice – ACCforum
Neurologists ? Help – ACCforum
ACC defrauding claimants through corrupt processes – ACCforum
Look at this List or Assessors – ACCforum
Steve Berry, from S.B Consultants in Christchurch – ACCforum
Depression, Aggression, and Sleep Disturbances – ACCforum (not noted by Google)
Just doing their ACC jobs – ACCforum
Have You Heard Of This Assessor – ACCforum
Warning Re Nerve Blocks – ACCforum
servicetofreemen – Viewing Profile – ACCforum
du Plessis – ACCforum – Page 6
Related articles
- ACC pays millions to send its ‘hatchets’ (stuff.co.nz)
- ACC: Proof that NZ Herald trolls ACCForum (laudafinem.wordpress.com)
- Reference: Recliner decliner ACC is unseated in battle (laudafinem.wordpress.com)
- New ACC board chair gets mixed reception (nzherald.co.nz)
- Editorial: ACC culture must be more fair and open (nzherald.co.nz)
- Abuse survivors struggling to access ACC (stuff.co.nz)
- New ACC privacy breach claimed (radionz.co.nz)
- Minister furious over ACC’s privacy stance (stuff.co.nz)
- Rebstock named chair of new ACC board (nzherald.co.nz)
- ACC board rapped by auditor-general (stuff.co.nz)
No Comments
Thanks Vic, we’ll be investigating the further information you have provided and want all of our informers/readers to know that we greatly appreciate your contributions. If there is anyone else out there that has info on this Dr Du Plessis or anyone else noted in our posts please feel free to email us, just let us know if you require total anonymity. If you do please use our email address and not the comments box: laudafinem@bigpond.com
The PDF version
http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZASCA/1997/93.pdf
Here is the SA Court Case I was referring to……..I cant locate anything on him being ousted from Canada as of yet.
http://www.saflii.org/cgi-bin/disp.pl?file=za/cases/ZASCA/1997/93.html&query=doctor%20du%20plessis
Thanks Vic,
We’ll take a close look at your tip, but you too, as a Kiwi, will realise that not all legal jurisdictions are born equal…….the information that you apparently “want us to find” may not be available: However if you yourself hold any info please feel free to send it to us at our published email address: laudafinem@bigpond.com
I think with your investigative skills you should look for info on Vic Du Plessis, I heard he left South Africa because of a Supreme Court pulling his evidence to bits, he then went to Canada where I heard he was ousted from there because again he worked for the insurance industry and was writing dodgy reports. He obviously then come to NZ because it is sheltered here where he cant be sued for his bad reports.