Another quality Warren Wilson development, 72 Upper Queen Street, can readers see 1.2 million dollars worth? Looking at the state of the un-permitted, high-wire shearers shed and earthquake death-trap, we reckon its worth the land value alone! (see WA Wilson V City Council in references below)
Following on from our posts, “BILL RITCHIE CAUGHT ON THE WRONG SIDE OF THE LEDGER” , “A BRIDGE TO FAR’ and “MAYER, CLODE, GILBERTSON, AND ANOTHER DAMNED SCAM TO CONCEAL ASSETS!” we have now sourced confirmation (online) that the “Friendly Liquidator” of Malcolm Mayer’s Sagecorpse, Warren Arthur Wilson, was himself declared bankrupt in May this year.
Looking at the various court transcripts and judgement’s we here at Lauda Finem believe that he was also undoubtedly aware of his own insolvency and impending demise when he accepted Mayer’s plea for the performance of a “Lazarus“ type miracle on what remained of the corpse….before the temple’s high priests (otherwise known as the SFO and the OA) arrived to officiate over the funeral.
Needless to say if you have honestly been wronged, have a crack have your day in court and keep at it until you prove the bastards corrupt. But in this case, with Wilson and his mates, it just gives those genuinely seeking justice a bad name in the public arena and enables activist or bent Judges, with their own private agenda, to fuck over genuine litigants (which in turn is then promoted by New Zealand’s complacent, incompetent and compliant orthodox media).
Mayer must have had a lot of confidence in Wilson, after all Wilson had some “legal training” and would have known what they had all done was wrong, indeed fraudulent. More importantly Wilson has a history of defying gravity by lifting and rescuing, otherwise dead, objects from the grave, at least until they yet again fell over (See photo above and the references below).
Wilson has very obviously spent years staving off the inevitable (having known himself that he had in fact been insolvent since 2009) frustrating his creditors and the courts with his many attempts to delay using strategies designed to obfuscate….truly bewildering tactics, as noted by an adroit Ellis J in Warren Arthur WILSON V ANZ NATIONAL BANK LTD [HC AK CIV-2010-404-5025 23 March 2012]:
[27] Secondly, and in light of Mr Wilson’s concession about the debt owing, it is difficult not to view Mr Wilson’s reliance on the CCCFA point as merely a delaying tactic. And even if that conclusion is unwarranted, Mr Wilson cannot in fairness say that he was not informed of the time limits for appealing or that his failure to act on that advice in order to protect his position was not a matter of choice on his part. Thus it seems to me that the prospects of Mr Wilson being granted leave to appeal 10 months out of time are slim. [our emphasis]
Mr Warren Arthur Wilson, the clearly pissed-off, tooled-up and hot-wired liquidator of a 50 Million dollar company (to think that the NZ Government allows this); photo courtesy Dr Grobler, a victim of Mr Warren Wilson’s abuse
We also believe it plausible that these delays in his own bankruptcy proceedings were by design (and necessary), given that as a bankrupt he could not have legitimately been appointed by Mayer as the “friendly liquidator” of SageCorp, in fact we’re wondering whether he has advised the official assignee and companies office of his newly found status, and further wonder whether he has resigned as Sagecorp’s liquidator….but we will most certainly get to the bottom of that particular mystery (see footnote/update below).
We note with some interest that once his creditors had finally succeeded in bankrupting Mr Wilson they then applied for a court order to have the file sealed.
For any court to accede to this type of application is somewhat unusual….after all, for justice to be done, proceedings and their respective outcomes ordinarily require complete transparency.
So just why was it that the High Court agreed to seal this particular file? Typically there are a number of reasons why this might have occurred.
For example if the file contained any false, fabricated, inaccurate or otherwise damaging or clearly malicious allegations against the party making the application, in this case a respected banking institution, reading between the lines the court may well have agreed with the applicants submissions, in that there was a need to grant the orders sought; to seal the file. One remnant does however remain available and its on line:
WILSON V ANZ NATIONAL BANK LTD HC AK CIV-2010-404-5025 23 March 2012
Whilst we have no clear evidence that this was the case, on the balance of probabilities, given Wilson’s propensity for throwing shit in the hope that it will stick (as noted by at least two senior judges[reported]), it is more than likely the reason for the file being sealed. We base this honest belief on a number of historic facts. The malicious and litigious Mr Warren Wilson’s prior court room antics and his proclivity for bringing maliciously false complaints and issuing obstructionist proceedings should it serve an agenda for either himself or those he purports to represent.
Whilst the Bankruptcy proceedings remain sealed, evidence of Wilson’s prior behaviour is to be found in a number of court judgments that are still available.
One such judgement (in one of Wilson’s many many many appeals) is Wilson v Auckland City Council, High Court Auckland, CRI 2006-404-000126 5 April 2007. Apparently Wilson in this matter had been making all sorts strange accusations with absolutely no evidence to support the outrageous claims he’d advanced at trial and in his appeal, including alleging that the trial judge, Callander DCJ, had been ” threatening and overbearing”.
In his appeal judgement the learned Venning J observed:
[17] There then followed a lengthy discussion between Judge Callander and the
appellant (Warren Arthur Wilson) in which the Judge warned the appellant that if he was going to pursue the issue of bad faith on the part of the Council or its officers then he would have to lead
evidence to prove it. The appellant referred to the judicial review proceedings but
the Judge quite correctly pointed out that the appellant would need to lead evidence
in the prosecution before him if he was to take account of it.The appellant then continued his cross-examination of the witness at the time, Mr de Leur. After a
further period of time the Judge advised the appellant again that the purpose of cross examination
was to ask witnesses questions, it was not an opportunity for the
appellant to make statements. The Judge went on to warn the appellant that if he
was going to make serious allegations of bad faith and they were unsubstantiated
then he could be in trouble. That was a proper warning to give and in the context of
the background to the earlier discussions between the appellant and the Judge it can
not be seen in any way as threatening or overbearing. [our emphasis]
We know that Wilson has made a habit of launching spurious complaints against Judges, lawyers, creditors and others, none of which have been upheld, all of which were at best ill conceived, but more likely than not, designed to obstruct and or perhaps further evidence of some sort of psychological instability…who the fuck knows, we’ll let readers draw their own conclusions as did as did Ellis J above, “Mr Wilson’s reliance on the CCCFA point as merely a delaying tactic“
One such complaint was against Fairfax’s National Business Review:
Case Number: 2148 WARREN WILSON AGAINST NATIONAL BUSINESS REVIEW
Council Meeting OCTOBER 2010
A complaint by Warren Wilson against the National Business Review is not upheld.
Malcolm Duncan Mayer “the 50 million dollar swindler”
The Article
The NBR article reported on a High Court hearing on an application to release two caveats. The property concerned was owned by a company in liquidation, Sagecorp, which was associated with a man, Malcolm Mayer, who had been quoted in another newspaper article, which appeared approximately 11 months earlier, as confessing to a crime.Mayer is being pursued by his creditors, who have evidently lost a considerable sum of money because of his activity, but is apparently elusive.
Mr Wilson is the liquidator of Sagecorp and was in court and addressed the Judge.
The article stated that the Associate Judge “says Malcolm Mayer can be contacted through his ‘friendly’ liquidator, Warren Wilson…”. The article referred to Mr Wilson’s address.The Complaint
The complaint alleges breaches of accuracy, fairness and balance.
Mr Wilson complains:a) the Associate Judge did not refer to him as the “friendly liquidator”;
b) the article did not report a comment made by the Associate Judge in his decision when the Judge responded to comments made by Mr Wilson;
c) the NBR was in breach of a suppression order made at an earlier stage;
d) the article was not accurate, fair or balanced, particularly when it did not refer to the nature of the proceeding and made no attempt to obtain any balancing comment. [we have named Malcolm Mayer and Sagecorp, the online judgement conceals both]
Now just why was it that Warren Wilson, as the Liquidator of Sage corp, took offense at being referred to as a “Friendly Liquidator” when he clearly was! After all the liquidation of Sagecorp is not the only thing that Mr Wilson had or in fact has in common with Malcolm Duncan Mayer.
We here at Lauda Finem are making ongoing inquiries focusing on Warren Wilson’s bankruptcy and the building he had financed at 72 Upper Queen Street that ultimately brought him unstuck.
We have an interest in one particular registered valuer, a bloke by the name of Parkinson. This valuer, well known to Warren Wilson, just happened to be responsible for putting a price on Malcolm Mayer’s 31 Shaddock Street, Eden Tce, Auckland New Zealand valued by Richard PARKINSON as 21 July 2003 at $700k, whilst a valuation Parkinson had completed a year earlier had only valued the same property at approximately $370K. That valuation might just have been artificially raised, as they often say “hydrauliced”; just like Mr Warren Wilson’s “tasteful” home additions in Upper Queen Street, Auckland (see photo above).
31 Shaddock Street is but one of the properties tied up in Trustee Executor limited’s (TEL) fraud allegations on which Mr Duncan Mayer currently stand’s trial.
We will of course be keeping our readers up to date with our investigations with future posts as new information comes to hand.
In the meantime, if you’re really interested, you may well like to have a gander at some of our research (references below) it makes for some interesting reading especially if you’re perhaps a lawyer, creditor or one of those Wilson has slandered with an interest in Mayer et al’s actions.
Sagecorp Limited
Company Number: 1887837
Incorporation Date: 22 Nov 2006
Company Status: Struck off
Previous Status: In Liquidation from 06 May 2010 to 02 Feb 2012
Registered: from 22 Nov 2006 to 06 May 2010
Entity type: NZ Limited Company
Constitution filed: No
Company Addresses: Registered Office Level 8, 82 Symonds Street, Auckland , New Zealand
Address for service: Level 8, 82 Symonds Street, Auckland , New Zealand
Directors Showing 1 of 1 directors. Malcolm Duncan MAYER, 8/82 Symonds Street, Auckland
Update 26/07/2012:
Sagecorp Limited was struck off the companies register just 8 days before Wilson himself was finally declared bankrupt, strange but true and not at all surprising given the years of abuse of process utilising Mr Wilson’s (Olympic gold on steriods) courtroom gymnastics. Should you wish to get in touch with Mr Wilson’s official assignee the details are below; we’ve also had a good chat with that particular office:
Insolvency Type: Creditor Petition
Estate Number: 856932
Name: WILSON, Warren Arthur
Year of Birth: 1954
Address at Adjudication: 72 Upper Queen Street, Eden Terrace, Auckland
Insolvency Status: Current Bankrupt
Adjudication Date/Time: 14-May-2012 11:19
Court: Auckland High Court
Occupation at Adjudication: RMA Consultant
Employment Status: Other
Multiple Insolvencies: Yes
Office for Enquiries: Auckland
Case Officer: PETERSEN, Dione
Email Officer: dione.petersen@insolvency.govt.nz
All media inquiries should be directed to alistair.stewart@insolvency.govt.nz
Foot Note:
Lauda Finem have recently received many emails in support of our efforts and in particular the detail our posts provide, also inquiring as to why we bother (this post in particular).
As life long students of Gandhiji, many of us having spent years in India, we will of course defer to Gandhi’s wisdom; as have undoubtedly many respectable and honest men throughout recent history, men such as Martin Luther King Jnr:
“I want to document coldly, rationally what is being done here, it may take months”
M K Gandhi
We also know, just as Bapu did, that sometimes it may take many decades to right a serious wrong doing:
“When I despair, I remember that all through history the way of truth and love have always won. There have been tyrants and murderers, and for a time, they can seem invincible, but in the end, they always fall. Think of it–always.”
M K Gandhi
If any reader has evidence of serious criminal offending by the New Zealand Government, its officials or even the occasional ratbag fraudster rest assured we will print it….so why not send us the detail?
Recent reading:
(The machinations of Warren Arthur Wilson’s mind and his alcohol fuelled, somewhat futile, attempts to counter laudafinems evidence)
warrenarthurwilson | warren arthur wilson random thoughts and …
Warren Arthur Wilson (WarrenArthurWil) on Twitter
warren arthur wilson | skyandflower
Reference/bibliography:
Warren Arthur Wilson
[1] WILSON V AUCKLAND CITY COUNCIL HC AK CRI 2006-404-000126 5 April 2007
[2] WILSON V AUCKLAND CITY COUNCIL AND ANOR HC AK CIV 2004-404-003303 5 April 2007
[3] WILSON V AUCKLAND CITY COUNCIL AND ANOR HC AK CIV 2004-404-003303 10 May 2007
[4] WILSON V AUCKLAND CITY COUNCIL HC AK CRI 2006-404-000126 24 May 2007
[5] WILSON V AUCKLAND CITY COUNCIL CA CA277/07 23 October 2007
[6] WILSON V AUCKLAND CITY COUNCIL AND ANOR HC AK CIV 2009-404-1292 28 September 2009
[7] WILSON V AUCKLAND CITY COUNCIL AND ANOR HC AK CIV 2009-404-1292 16 November 2009
[8] WILSON V ANZ NATIONAL BANK LTD HC AK CIV-2010-404-5025 23 March 2012
[9] Conviction for illegal building work – Auckland City
[10] Conviction for illegal building work | Scoop News
[11] Shark Patrol; Bankrupcy notifications 18 May 2012
[12] Case Number: 2148 WARREN WILSON AGAINST NATIONAL BUSINESS REVIEW
Malcolm Duncan Mayer
[1] BANK OF NEW ZEALAND V MAYER AND ANOR HC AK CIV-2009-404-7828 3 December 2009
[2] MALCOLM DUNCAN MAYER V TRUSTEES EXECUTORS LIMITED HC AK CIV 2010-404-000902 26 April 2010
[3] WESTPAC NEW ZEALAND LIMITED V SAGECORP LIMITED AND ANOR HC AK CIV 2010-404-001171 3 August 2010
[4] RICE CRAIG SOLICITORS NOMINEE CO LTD V M D MAYER AND ANOR HC AK CIV-2010-404-004099 10 August 2010
[5] TRUSTEES EXECUTORS LTD V EDEN HOLDINGS (2010) LTD HC WANG CIV-2010-483-000101 12 August 2010
[6] MALCOLM DUNCAN MAYER V SERIOUS FRAUD OFFICE CA695/2010 12 November 2010
[7] TRUSTEES EXECUTORS LIMITED V EDEN HOLDINGS 2010 LIMITED CA CA526/2010 20 December 2010
[8] MALCOLM DUNCAN MAYER V R COA CA829/2010 25 February 2011
Brent Clode
[1] RAISER DEVELOPMENTS LTD V TREFOIL PROPERTIES LTD & ANOR HC AK CIV 2005-404-5883 16 November 2006
[3] JIREH CUSTOMS LTD V GRAFTON ROAD BUILDING LTD AND ORS HC AK CIV 2007-404-007586 18 December 2007
[4] JIREH CUSTOMS LIMITED V CLODE HC AK CIV2007-404-3106 28 October 2008
[5] FERN LIMITED V FINANCIAL TRUST LIMITED AND ANOR HC AK CIV-2009-404-4055 23 September 2009
[7] FERN LIMITED V FINANCIAL TRUST LIMITED AND ANOR HC AK CIV-2009-404-4055 7 May 2010
[8] TRUSTEES EXECUTORS LIMITED V EDEN HOLDINGS 2010 LIMITED CA CA526/2010 20 December 2010
[9] FINANCIAL TRUST LIMITED V WANGANELLA TRUSTEE LIMITED HC AK CIV-2010-404-3928 1 August 2011
William (Bill) Alexander Ritchie
[2] W.A.RITCHIE V BANK OF NEW ZEALAND HC HAM CIV-2010-419-687 15 March 2011
[3] BANGERTER, AND ANOR V RETAIL ON MAIN LIMITED HC AK CIV2005-404-4403 12 September 2005
Lance Gilbertson
[2] JIREH CUSTOMS LTD V GRAFTON ROAD BUILDING LTD AND ORS HC AK CIV 2007-404-007586 18 December 2007
[3] TRUSTEES EXECUTORS LTD V EDEN HOLDINGS (2010) LTD HC WANG CIV-2010-483-000101 12 August 2010
[4] TRUSTEES EXECUTORS LIMITED V EDEN HOLDINGS 2010 LIMITED CA CA526/2010 20 December 2010
[5] FINANCIAL TRUST LIMITED V WANGANELLA TRUSTEE LIMITED HC AK CIV-2010-404-3928 1 August 2011
Champion Apartments
[1] TRUSTEES EXECUTORS LTD V EDEN HOLDINGS (2010) LTD HC WANG CIV-2010-483-000101 12 August 2010
[2] TRUSTEES EXECUTORS LIMITED V EDEN HOLDINGS 2010 LIMITED CA CA526/2010 20 December 2010
[3] WOODROFFE V COLEMAN AND COLEMAN HC AK CIV-2011-404-4391 11 November 2011
Further Reading:
http://www.sfo.govt.nz/case/malcolm-duncan-mayer-1735
Fraud accused ‘tried to be invisible’
Witness in Malcom Mayer trial accused of bias
$130,000 cash deposit ‘unusual’
Developer faces $50m fraud trial
1 Comment
An update Lauda, apparently Warren Wilson has been elected as president of the NZ Bankrupt businessmans association. The position earns the formal title . ‘Grand fucktard’